[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits.
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits. |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:55:42 -0600 |
Paul F. wrote:
> (one way to reduce the likelihood of this, and of the original
> overflow issue, might be to pass the message arguments to rmmproc in
> the same form that they were received by refile. currently "refile
> all" causes a call to rmmproc with a full enumeration of message
> numbers. if "refile all" instead caused "rmmproc all", on the
> assumption that the same expansion would result, then the original
> invocation of refile would be as likely to fail as rmmproc. there are
> probably subtleties to this i'm not getting right now.)
I think this should work. rmmproc could call "pick <args>"
to get the same expansion.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits., (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits., David Levine, 2012/11/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits., David Levine, 2012/11/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits.,
David Levine <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits., David Levine, 2012/11/27