[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:34:09 -0800 |
On Mar 7, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> I mean, at some point you have to decide if
> your goal is to send RFC 2045-compliant messages, or be able to send and
> read email that the rest of the world can understand.
Why can't I do both?
If other people cannot see the utility of inlining content, that's fine. But
it's not an excuse to prevent me (or anyone else who *does* see the utility)
from doing so.
This sort of rationalization leads to the argument that everything on the
internet should be converted to run over HTTP on port 80.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Paul Fox, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, chad, 2014/03/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/03/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Paul Fox, 2014/03/07
Re: [Nmh-workers] Pager output on mhshow, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/03/07