[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:51:58 -0400 |
Ralph wrote:
> I'd expect nmh users to be Unix users familiar with cat(1). I'd expect
> it to make sense to them for that alone?
>
> On the question of whether the option should be named so the default is
> the -no-less version, I don't think that matters. More important is a
> negative term isn't sought out to make that true so a double-negative
> results when -no is prefixed.
Agreed. There are some other nmh program switches that default
to their -no form.
David
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, bergman, 2014/03/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Robert Elz, 2014/03/23