|
From: | Philip Nienhuis |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55667] Conflict between package namespace and function name |
Date: | Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:37:26 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #55667 (project octave): > _From the point of view of the implementation, I'd be glad to eliminate the possibility of further indexing function calls_ Probably it'll bring some pain for recoding, sure. But another question: does further or repeated indexing save memory? In Matlab, I'd have to slice and sub-slice numeric/struct/cell arrays using intermediate variables for each indexing step and that sometimes takes considerable RAM (esp. cell arrays); I figured that one of the advantages of repeated indexing would be avoiding these intermediate storgae steps. Am I right there? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55667> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |