[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Om-synth] om and lash memory usage
From: |
Antonio |
Subject: |
[Om-synth] om and lash memory usage |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:52:31 +0200 |
Hi,
I've note that simply launching lashd, lash_panel, om and om_gtk with
an empty patch eats lots of memory. Here is top's output:
PID %CPU S NI COMMAND USER VIRT RES SHR SWAP %MEM PR
7960 0.0 S 0 om anto 73368 71m 6540 8 28.6 15
7949 0.0 S 0 lashd anto 46424 45m 4944 0 18.1 16
7824 1.4 S 0 jackd anto 35696 34m 2524 16 13.9 18
7823 0.0 S 0 qjackctl anto 27992 27m 17m 0 10.9 15
7969 0.0 S 0 om_gtk anto 58024 14m 10m 42m 5.8 15
If I launch om without lashd the memory usage decreases of ~ 20MB. I
have 256MB of ram (yes I know they aren't too much) and the swap
become heavily used even on a simple session.
Is this the average memory usage?
Cheers,
~ Antonio
- [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage,
Antonio <=
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/24
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage, Antonio, 2005/10/25
- [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Antonio, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Nigel Henry, 2005/10/25
- Re: [Om-synth] patchage & libjack, Dave Robillard, 2005/10/25
- [Om-synth] Re: patchage & libjack, Loki Davison, 2005/10/26
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: patchage & libjack, elgrande, 2005/10/26