Re: [Om-synth] om and lash memory usage

[Dave Robillard]

On Thu, 2005-27-10 at 15:54 +0200, Antonio wrote:
> 2005/10/26, Dave Robillard <address@hidden>:
> [cut]
> > Hmm... that's quite a bit larger. :/
> >
> > Do you have a patch(es) loaded?
> 
> Nope. I had just created an empty patch, but also loading a (little)
> patch doesn't increase too much the memory usage. Seems to me that the
> memory consumption is decreased in om nearly of 30MB, while is quite
> the same in om_gtk.

Yes, I havn't done anything to om_gtk.  It shouldn't be mlockall'ed, so
it shouldn't be as important.  Almost all of the overhead there is GTK
and GnomeCanvas :/

Strange that Om is so much larger on your machine than mine though.

-DR-