[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Sep 2004 22:32:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jeremy Shaw <address@hidden> writes:
>
> The site is a bit light on details, but it seems like using scheme
> would bring a whole host of disadvantages -- run-time type errors,
> non-termination, etc.
>
Hm. I won't enter in yet another debate of static vs. dynamic typing,
but i don't really see how Make is free from the (potential) drawbacks
you mention (writing a non-terminating makefile, or a non-terminating
program in any language for that matter, seems rather straightforward).
> I would be interested in taking a peek later when there is a bit more
> to look at though...
>
Thank you. I'll keep you posted :).
jao
--
Long hair minimizes the need for barbers; socks can be done without;
one leather jacket solves the coat problem for many years; suspenders
are superfluous. (Albert Einstein)
pgpiWY4IkgyrB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/05
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2004/09/05
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/05
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl,
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <=
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/07
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Robert Collins, 2004/09/07
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Tom Lord, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Tom Lord, 2004/09/10
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/18
- Re: [Pika-dev] xl, xxl, and mxl, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2004/09/30