[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior
From: |
Whit Blauvelt |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:53:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 04:37:02PM -0600, Josh Nisly wrote:
> The "impossible calculation" may be gzipping the 16GB file -
> rdiff-backup gzips deleted files to save space.
That would be curious, since the file wasn't deleted on the original system.
If you're right then --max-file-size = treat as if the original's been
deleted. Which seems wrong, since it hasn't been. I think that would qualify
as a bug?
Not really complaining. Rdiff-backup's obviously better here than rsync
itself - that is, the older rdiff-backup's better than the very latest
rsync. Surprising, but there we are.
Whit
- [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Jernej Simončič, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Josh Nisly, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior,
Whit Blauvelt <=
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Jernej Simončič, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Maarten Bezemer, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Maarten Bezemer, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/14