[RULE] Font paths, was: Problem starting X

[M. Fioretti]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 22:13:56 at 10:13:56PM +0200, Ingo Lantschner 
(address@hidden) wrote:
> 
> 4. Somewhere on the list I read that replacing xfs with static
> font-pathes may be good for performance. Is this still true?

This is true when you install applications that need xfs (**). Newer
applications, especially in Red Hat, have already started using the
new fontconfig/xft2 font system. They don't need xfs at all.

        Ciao,

                Marco Fioretti

(**) check the output of rpm --requires on the rpm package that you
want to install to know it
-- 
Marco Fioretti                 m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory         http://www.rule-project.org/en/

[Crash programs] fail because they are based on the theory that, with
nine women pregnant, you can get a baby a month.
                                                Wernher von Braun