[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RULE] Suggestions for future slinkys
From: |
Rodolfo J. Paiz |
Subject: |
Re: [RULE] Suggestions for future slinkys |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:47:49 -0600 |
At 15:50 3/31/2004, you wrote:
1) when (tiny)X starts, it signals a hostname lookup failure
Is the hostname properly set in /etc/hosts and in /etc/sysconfig/network?
3) the route command gives one route to/through 169.254.0.0 . Why?
It's called "zeroconf" and is the set of IP addresses onto which DHCP
clients are supposed to fall back if they cannot get a valid lease. This is
not harmful (and can actually be useful), but can be configured not to
happen in any case. Did you ask out of curiosity, or would you really like
to eliminate it?
4) Can we add the option to install RH up2date, or in any case some
graphic frontend to update the whole system(resolving dependencies
automatically)
I suggest yum, since it's supported by the newer up2date in Fedora and also
by many other sites. It should not be hard to find "yummified" repositories
for RHL-7.x through RHL-9... I know Fedora Legacy has one, and surely some
of the RH mirrors also support yum.
These are the only things to which I can make any useful comment.
Cheers,
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
address@hidden
http://www.simpaticus.com