[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: Overwriting bare repositories' master

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Sylvain Beucler escreveu:
> > > It is better if we get a few interested users to use the service, so
> > > as to steer early in the right direction.
> > OK. What would be your proposal?  We can move our repo from repo.or.cz 
> > to savannah, and leave the CVS import cron running on lilypond.org. Do 
> > you want to do it now, or do you need some time?
> >
> > One thing that I wanted to remark: I think it's best to have not one 
> > repo per project, but rather, one repository per module. We have a bunch 
> > of modules that are related to LilyPond, but are on different release 
> > schedules.
>
> We can create the repository now.

Ok, I will discuss with Jan whether the current repo is good enough for 
official installation.

> I see that at repo.or.cz this means 'fork' rather than
> 'subproject'. Maybe that'll become something like:
> /srv/git/project.git
> /srv/git/project/s/subproject.git
> /srv/git/project/f/subproject.git
> if this is needed.
>
> What would you need?

we will probably need (in the long run): the following subprojects:

 - lilypond
 - newweb
 - workbook
 - ikebana
 - mac-installer
 - gub

currently, we also have a module mftrace, but I think it would be better 
to have that as a separate project.

> Also, is there a difficulty in using several heads instead of several
> repositories? That is, why not "one head per module" instead of "one
> repository per module"?

GIT repositories can contain multiple branches, and GIT encourages to 
use them, although some people seem to find it confusing (when compared 
to other systems)

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen