Re: [Sks-devel] two SKS servers are ~2400 keys behind

[Daniel Johnson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The logs look OK, so I'm inclined to agree with Yaron.

Random thought: What pros/cons would there be in making the sync run
at 0300 GMT?  Stats should then reflect a snapshot of the SKS network
as a whole, rather than just a particular timezone.

On 7 Jan 2004 at 20:08, Jason Harris wrote:
> http://dannyj.dynip.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats reports:
> 
>   Taken at 2004-01-07 03:01:24 CST
>   Total number of keys: 1947723
> 
> and http://thor.chguernsey.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats reports:
> 
>   Taken at 2004-01-07 03:01:33 CST
>   Total number of keys: 1947723
> 
> while http://keyserver.noreply.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats
reports
> results typical of most others:
> 
>   Taken at 2004-01-07 03:02:29 CET
>   Total number of keys: 1950166
> 
> Have the first two servers not been syncing recently?
> 
> -- 
> Jason Harris          | NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed,
isn't it?
> address@hidden | web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
> 

- -- 
Through the modem, off the server, over the T1, past the frame-relay,
< < NOTHIN' BUT NET > >
 
Daniel Johnson
address@hidden
http://dannyj.come.to/
Public PGP Keys & other info: http://dannyj.come.to/pgp/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.95

iD8DBQE//WAl6vGcUBY+ge8RAvuTAJsHZ7ru5jyotaTg1EpAQU7Tki+RGwCfTM/B
65/eVmufpG5X5E8pyhzXHYg=
=4GbQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----