Re: [Sks-devel] two SKS servers are ~2400 keys behind

[Yaron M. Minsky]

On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:51, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:51:07AM -0600, Daniel Johnson wrote:
> > The logs look OK, so I'm inclined to agree with Yaron.
> > 
> > Random thought: What pros/cons would there be in making the sync run
> > at 0300 GMT?  Stats should then reflect a snapshot of the SKS network
> > as a whole, rather than just a particular timezone.
> 
> One con is that anyone accessing the SKS network at 0300 GMT would
> probably get poor performance.  If each SKS machine ran its stats at
> different times, there is a better chance of hitting a machine that
> was not compiling stats.

Indeed, that's why I made the choice.  The thinking was that local users
were less likely to be hitting the machine at 3AM.

That being said, the problem is less bad than it used to be, now that
stats only take a couple of minutes to calculate.

y

> David
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sks-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
-- 
|--------/            Yaron M. Minsky              \--------|
|--------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|

Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916
Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916