[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?)
From: |
David Shaw |
Subject: |
[Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?) |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:17:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.8i |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:33:25AM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:54:09AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:24:27AM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
>
> > > Thus, in reality, the "Expect: 100-continue" header appears to be
> > > confusing
> > > SKS (during POSTs).
>
> > Hmm. No really good way to fix that in GPG or curl since they can't
> > detect that a server is 1.0 without doing a GET first. Curl, if I
>
> Disregard that.
>
> It isn't the Expect: header, it was the [s]scanf. This patch fixes it:
Excellent. Thanks, Jason. I'm glad these little details are getting
fixed before the next GnuPG which uses curl by default.
David
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), (continued)
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), Yaron Minsky, 2005/08/13
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), Yaron Minsky, 2005/08/19
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), David Shaw, 2005/08/19
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), Yaron Minsky, 2005/08/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), David Shaw, 2005/08/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), Yaron Minsky, 2005/08/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), David Shaw, 2005/08/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?), Yaron Minsky, 2005/08/20
- [Sks-devel] Re: SKS v. unknown HTTP headers (was: Re: IPv6 failover?),
David Shaw <=