[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!
From: |
Valentin Sundermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...! |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2016 18:13:18 +0200 |
Hi,
> Can we add a proof of work mechanism to make adding a key to the server
> more "costly" ?.
There are some blockchain based approaches on how to distribute keys (or
managing identity) like Blockstack(.org) with their "blockchain id".
Their current model is, that you order a normal name (like domain names)
via a bitcoin/altcoin transaction for a certain price.
I read somewhere that there is support for free namespaces but I don't
know if they use the proof of work concept too.
It's not really related, but I think a keyserver with blockchain id
support which speaks the usual protocol towards the client would be
really great.
Though it don't solves any problems with SKS, I think it's worth a mention.
Best regards,
Valentin
Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!,
Valentin Sundermann <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Christian Felsing, 2016/05/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Robert J. Hansen, 2016/05/25
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Pascal Levasseur, 2016/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Moritz Wirth, 2016/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Robert J. Hansen, 2016/05/26
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Martin Papik, 2016/05/27
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Pascal Levasseur, 2016/05/27
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Kim Minh Kaplan, 2016/05/27
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Andrew Gallagher, 2016/05/27
- Re: [Sks-devel] Oh, Jeeez...!, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2016/05/27