[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] gmfsk, xlog and adif-compliance
From: |
Andrea Borgia |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] gmfsk, xlog and adif-compliance |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:35:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20031124 Debian/1.3-1 |
Joop Stakenborg wrote:
gmfsk, so it can be used in the normal log. We can then convert it to
adif specification when saving as adif. If you send me the
conversion needed, I will add it to the next release.
At present, the following mappings are needed for eQsl.cc:
throb1 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
throb2 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
throb4 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
If you have a copy of the current ADIF specs handy, it may be worth
checking out what they say about this; I could only find version 1, not
2 (and Throb isn't even present in v1).
In the meantime, I have explained the importance of the number in Throb
mode entries to the eQsl.cc staff and they're considering whether to
change the import function to accept it.
B73,
Andrea.
--
Homepage: http://andrea.borgia.bo.it / Amateur radio: IZ4FHT
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?