Re: [Xlog-discussion] gmfsk, xlog and adif-compliance

[Joop Stakenborg]

Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Joop Stakenborg wrote:
>
> > gmfsk, so it can be used in the normal log. We can then convert it to
> > adif specification when saving as adif. If you send me the
> > conversion needed, I will add it to the next release.
>
>
> At present, the following mappings are needed for eQsl.cc:
> throb1 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
> throb2 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
> throb4 -> "throb" (or "thrb")
>
> If you have a copy of the current ADIF specs handy, it may be worth
> checking out what they say about this; I could only find version 1, not
> 2 (and Throb isn't even present in v1).

We also need bpsk31->psk31, qpsk31->psk31 and feldhell->hell. Just 
comitted to CVS.

I found a copy of the ADIF 2 specs on Jaime's web site: 
http://jaime.robles.nu/klog/adif214.html

> In the meantime, I have explained the importance of the number in Throb
> mode entries to the eQsl.cc staff and they're considering whether to
> change the import function to accept it.

I will stay with a ADIF for the time being.

> B73,
> Andrea.

Thanks,
Joop PG4I