[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Date format error with Cabrillo import?
From: |
Joop Stakenborg |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Date format error with Cabrillo import? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:32:20 +0100 |
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:38:47 -0600
Nate Bargmann <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> Is this a bug or does the import function not touch the date format as
> it seems to do when importing from TLF format?
>
You are right ;-)
xlog didn't touch the date...
> I prefer using the Cabrillo format when available as I seem to get a
> cleaner log (with RST + zone, etc.), plus it may be the only way to
> import some old CT logs these days. Having to fix the date on a
> moderately large log doesn't sound like much fun! ;-)
>
The attached patch fixes the date field when doing cabrillo import.
One more question:
Do the other fields look okay? I noticed cabrillo import uses different
field widths depending on the type of contest (see 'CONTEST:' field in
the cabrillo file).
'CONTEST: NA' and 'CONTEST: ARRL-SS' are recognized by xlog, what does
your log say?
I noticed fields get garbled when doing a cabrillo import from tlf when
'CONTEST:' is other then 'NA' or 'ARRL-SS', but I don't know if tlf
follows the right cabrillo format....
> 73, de Nate >>
>
> --
> Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
> Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
> http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
> My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
> http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
>
>
Regards,
Joop PG4I
cabrillo.diff
Description: Text Data