xlog-discussion
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate


From: Joop Stakenborg
Subject: Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:38:54 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8

>> This works perfectly, no errors!
>
> As it does here.  It helps if the dumb operator on this end selects
> Polling!  AAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!
>

Well, another problem fixed :-)

> How could I miss that?  I guess I confused that with the "transceive"
> mode other rigs can be put into.  I selected it and all is working
> well (well, the S-meter isn't working, but I'm not sure if I ever coded
> that into the Hamlib backend for the FT-920).
>
> Now, here is an idea for a future version.  A button to "suspend"
> Hamlib might be useful to avoid contention when using gmfsk, fldigi, or
> similar.  As it seems to work now, if I disable Hamlib support in the
> Preferences dialog, my settings aren't preserved.
>

That's right. It forces the user to reconfigure hamlib then next time it
is enabled.

The suspend option seems like a good idea. Although a better solution for
you would be to use rpc.rigd, so all of your applications will work
happily with hamlib at the same time.

> Someday I'll figure this computer stuff out!  *:-/
>
> Sorry for the false alarm.  Sigh...
>

Until the next time.... :)

> 73, de Nate >>
>


Joop, PG4I





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]