[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate
From: |
Joop Stakenborg |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:38:54 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8 |
>> This works perfectly, no errors!
>
> As it does here. It helps if the dumb operator on this end selects
> Polling! AAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!
>
Well, another problem fixed :-)
> How could I miss that? I guess I confused that with the "transceive"
> mode other rigs can be put into. I selected it and all is working
> well (well, the S-meter isn't working, but I'm not sure if I ever coded
> that into the Hamlib backend for the FT-920).
>
> Now, here is an idea for a future version. A button to "suspend"
> Hamlib might be useful to avoid contention when using gmfsk, fldigi, or
> similar. As it seems to work now, if I disable Hamlib support in the
> Preferences dialog, my settings aren't preserved.
>
That's right. It forces the user to reconfigure hamlib then next time it
is enabled.
The suspend option seems like a good idea. Although a better solution for
you would be to use rpc.rigd, so all of your applications will work
happily with hamlib at the same time.
> Someday I'll figure this computer stuff out! *:-/
>
> Sorry for the false alarm. Sigh...
>
Until the next time.... :)
> 73, de Nate >>
>
Joop, PG4I
- [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/05
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/06
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib support in 1.4, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/06
- [Xlog-discussion] testing set_conf for Nate, Joop Stakenborg, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/22
- [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/22
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate,
Joop Stakenborg <=
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Alexandru Csete, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/23
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: testing set_conf for Nate, Nate Bargmann, 2007/02/24