[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms
From: |
Jason White |
Subject: |
Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:04:24 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> But since we cannot have the free replacement soon, this would mean
> developing programs that would, for the foreseeable future, only run
> on proprietary platforms. We cannot even recommend such programs to
> people, let alone release them.
I agree. I think it is best to solve the hardest problem first. Once there is
a good, free as in freedom, speech recognizer, people can build applications
around it.
I would also argue that the notion of "economic freedom" as introduced in this
discussion is fundamentally misconceived and that it obscures important
distinctions. Economic injustice is an important problem, a daily reality for
a significant proportion of the global human population; but it happens not to
be the problem that the GNU Project and the FSF exist to solve.
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, (continued)
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Christian Hofstader, 2010/07/28
- [Accessibility] Why not first an IDE that recognizes speech?, Susan Jolly, 2010/07/28
- Re: [Accessibility] Why not first an IDE that recognizes speech?, Eric S. Johansson, 2010/07/28
- Re: [Accessibility] Why not first an IDE that recognizes speech?, Susan Jolly, 2010/07/28
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Eric S. Johansson, 2010/07/28
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Chris Hofstader, 2010/07/29
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Eric S. Johansson, 2010/07/29
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Richard Stallman, 2010/07/25
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms,
Jason White <=
- Re: [Accessibility] Call to Arms, Eric S. Johansson, 2010/07/26