[AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze

[David Kastrup]

Frank Küster <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> It is and never was my intent to trick people into participation in
>> AUCTeX by representing the situation different than it was.  If you
>> feel that you have been treated unfairly, I would ask you to
>> specify your contributions to the AUCTeX manual that you would
>> rather not have contributed had you felt reason to expect that the
>> manual could get relicensed under the GFDL.  I would then see
>> whether they can be replaced with reasonable effort.
>
> Oh, let's not do that.  I wouldn't say I have been tricked; I have
> had a different expectation of the FSF than it turned out was true.
> Call it being tricked, but then it wasn't you or the developer team
> who did that.
>
> I'm glad that AUCTeX has a good manual, and I'm particularly happy
> if I somehow contributed to that.  When I signed the papers, I knew
> that I gave the work (in part) out of my hands, so be it.  I won't
> further contribute anything ATM, but it's a totally worthless effort
> to sort out what I have done once upon a time and back that out.
> I'd rather do something that improves AUCTeX.

Thanks,

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum