Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS

[Damien Cassou]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I agree with Tassilo, that would allow us to get rid of cvs entirely.
>> Moreover, that would let me easily handle the 2 patches I sent to the
>> mailing list that were not merged (yet?).
>
> That's because we haven't concluded our discussion on the patches yet.
> Switching the VCS won't help with that.

That's ok if the patches take time to merge, I can perfectly
understand. However, a DVCS would allow me to easily maintain my own
fork :-).

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry