[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] [MaC?] (was: 11.87, some progress, problems with synctex
[AUCTeX-devel] [MaC?] (was: 11.87, some progress, problems with synctex and forward pdf search)
Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:42:39 +0200
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) XEmacs/21.5-b33 (linux)
>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Mosè,
>> My idea is as follows:
>> - convert `TeX-source-correlate-method-active' into a function;
>> - leave `TeX-source-correlate-determine-method' as it is now, at least
>> I don't think it will be necessary to change it as I proposed last
>> - add the alist above to the possible values of
>> - adapt `TeX-source-correlate-mode'.
>> But a patch is worth a thousand words, see the one attached.
>> I believe a safe default for `TeX-source-correlate-method' would be
>> '((dvi . source-specials) (pdf . synctex))
>> which is compatible with most viewers, instead of the current 'auto.
While I perfectly understand you former patch, I right now do not see
the advantage for your new approach. Besides, are you sure it does not
Another even more important issue: different OS.
I never really have used LateX on windows so I can't say anything.
Recently I had to deal with a Mac, OS Lion with MacPorts. This is almost
a linux-like environment (there is texlive and okular, which right now
does not work for me and evince (and of course xpdf, but this seems not
appropriate for forward+inverse search).
So it boils down to this: which configuration (viewer) should be used
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature