auctex-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH v3]: Merge /preview/ into top-level


From: Mosè Giordano
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [PATCH v3]: Merge /preview/ into top-level
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:38:19 +0100

Hi Davide,

2014-11-19 17:28 GMT+01:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti <address@hidden>:
>>>>>>  MG == Mosè Giordano [2014-11-19]
>
> MG> 2014-11-19 7:13 GMT+01:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti <address@hidden>:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I suggest to create a separated branch with this patch.  You could
>>> then rebase the branch as needed, as long as it's clearly documented
>>> what the branch is for and that it will be rebased.
>
> MG> That's a good idea, but where do you mean it should be documented?
> MG> AUCTeX page on Savannah?
>
> That would be a good place, i.e.,
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/development.html>.  Also perhaps a
> most natural place would be README.GIT?
>
> I would document there what every branch is for, as well as what's every
> branch rebase policy, so people clearly know what to expect and what
> branch should they base their work on, and don't get baffled by
> unexpected rebase uses.  We could just prepend such a description to the
> current README.GIT content.

Done, thanks for the suggestion.  Feel free the improve the
descriptions of the branches.

> BTW, while
> we are at it, simplify-TeX-parse-error looks like a feature branch to
> me, and I personally find that continuous merges with master hide the
> progress on that branch: I would prefer to see it regularly rebased onto
> master, rather than merged, as the history (as in git log) would be IMO
> easier to follow; master could then be finally merged with
> simplify-TeX-parse-error when that feature gets ready.

Agreed, Tassilo, what do you think?

Actually, I'd like to see this feature merged into master at some
point.  The last time I tested it, the new TeX-parse-TeX was able to
catch some more errors (and some less) than the old one.
`TeX-file-line-error' is great, but ideally AUCTeX should be able to
catch all errors by itself.

Bye,
Mosè



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]