auctex-devel
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [RFC] parsing \jobname in LaTeX files?

 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [RFC] parsing \jobname in LaTeX files? Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 08:51:32 +0200

On 2015-09-01, at 07:46, Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> wrote:

>
> Hi Mosè,
>
>> I'd like to do a little survey: does someone find useful to correctly
>> parse \jobname in LaTeX files?  To be clear, as it is now,
>>
>>     \include{\jobname-foo}
>>
>> are ignored by the parser.[1] Do you think it's valuable to make
>> \jobname be replaced by (TeX-master-file)' when parsing the file?
>>
>> This should be feasible by changing LaTeX-auto-cleanup' and some
>> regexps in LaTeX-auto-regexp-list', but before starting hacking on it
>> I'd like some feedback.
>
> I don't use \jobname so I don't have a real opinion on this.  But
> \jobname could be anything, the basename of the master file is just the
> default, no?  That is, I could set TeX-command-extra-options' to
> "-jobname foo" although my document is bar.tex, and then \jobname
> expands to "foo".

For the record, the above is true about any control sequence, of course:
you can always do \def\jobname{42} etc.  My opinion is that if a user
changes things like \jobname, s/he should know what s/he's doing, and
strange effects/breakage of AUCTeX's parser are acceptable.

BTW, one thing where \jobname is very useful for me is typesetting
different versions of the same document, based on whether a certain
substring is present in \jobname.  Then, I can use symlinks to have
different, but synchronized versions of the document.  Seems not related
to this discussion, though.

> Bye,
> Tassilo

Best,

--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science