[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inserting comments
From: |
Keita Ikumi |
Subject: |
Re: Inserting comments |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2021 00:27:55 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
OWM Mail 3 |
>Yes, I was more thinking about `LaTeX-flushleft-env-list-local' (or
>something like that). I asked for this because I think we need more
>flexibility in AUCTeX's indentation code. My plea is to implement an
>interface and don't setq-local custom variables and then append stuff
>them later.
That's ambitious, and seems good.
>>> The proposed solution fails if a user defines a comment environment
>>> without using the comment package.
>>
>> Is there a simple way to define a comment environment without using the
>> comment package? (I'm not really opposed to your idea, just out of
>> curiosity)
>
>I was thinking about the standard way of defining environments with
>\newenvironment{comment} :-)
Ah, understood. Sorry, what I had in mind was an environment which
hides everything in it :-)
Best,
Ikumi Keita