[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimization for install-sh
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Optimization for install-sh |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:09:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 03:32:31PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: Hello, Alexandre!
:
: > > : + if [ x"$chmodcmd" != x ]; then $doit $chmodcmd $dsttmp; else
:;fi &&
: >
: > > Shouldn't all these be rewritten as "if test ...;" instead?
:
: Better portability of "test" compared to "[" is probably one of the "urban
: legends".
I thought we liked urban legends...
Anyways, I say we rewrite it for consistency with the rest of the Autoconf
scripts. We don't want [] tests trickling back into autoconf because of the
m4 quotes.
: > { test "x$...cmd" = x || $doit $...cmd $arg ; }
:
: That's not quite the same. If the command (e.g. strip) is not defined we
: don't want to ignore the consequtive commands. But if it fails we do want
: to bail out, since running "chmod 4755 foo" after failed "chown r00t foo"
: would be _very_ bad.
Anyways, there were a whole sh*tload of redundant else clauses in that script
that we could remove. If not for more readability; think of all the diskspace
we can save ;)
Lars J
- Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/08
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Message not available
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10