[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default |
Date: |
05 Dec 2001 12:01:39 +0100 |
Am Mit, 2001-12-05 um 10.53 schrieb Akim Demaille:
> >>>>> "juhp" == Jens Petersen <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> * bin/autoconf.in (AUTOM4TE): Prefix with bindir, so that autoconf
> >> runs even when it is installed outside the current PATH.
>
> juhp> Did anyone have time to consider this patch? Is it considered
> juhp> useful or not?
>
> I'm not in favor of it. I believe that the principle of least
> surprise means obeying to the PATH. In the past, autoconf has had
> problems because of hard coded paths.
>
> But I am waiting for the input of other people.
To me, the basic question is:
Is autom4te a user-visible, user-invocable, designed to be interactively
used tool?
In this case, hanging on to $PATH is the way to go, IMHO.
If not, ie. if autom4te is considered to be an autoconf internal
implementation detail, and not particularily designed to be used
interactively, then Jens' patch is a step into the correct direction.
However I am inclined to have autom4te moved out of bindir (and
therefore $PATH) in this case.
Ralf
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2001/12/04
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/05
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2001/12/05
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Ralf Corsepius, 2001/12/05
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/12/05
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2001/12/06
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/12/06
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2001/12/06
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/12/06
- Re: include bindir in AUTOM4TE default, Jens Petersen, 2001/12/06