[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?
From: |
Roger Leigh |
Subject: |
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:57:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> One approach that Autoconf could take is to provide a special
>> exception so that any sample code copied from the documentation is
>> licensed under the GPL or LGPL rather than GFDL.
>
> Thanks for this suggestion. At the end of this message is a proposed
> patch along those lines. Would this patch be enough to satisfy the
> Debian folks?
I agree with the change (plus the additional improvements others have
suggested), which will make it possible for others to use the code
examples.
However, the manual is still licensed under the terms of the GFDL, a
licence which is not considered to meet the requirements of the Debian
Free Software Guidelines. Therefore I believe it is not possible to
distribute under the amended terms, but debian-legal will be able to
give a more accurate analysis than myself (I see Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh is going to take care of this, thanks!).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFBxc8mVcFcaSW/uEgRAocXAJ9KUabssNUZMJPIibf0vsc+bvluhgCgjJVh
JJPdwVtjepylXEyV03TTilg=
=uY8o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, (continued)
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/21
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/21
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?,
Roger Leigh <=
- Message not available
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2004/12/18
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Proulx, 2004/12/18