[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:57:20 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
> Changing "program" to "program code" in relevant portions of the
> patch would cause it to make more sense.
Good idea. Here's a revised patch that takes this comment into account.
To apply this patch to Autoconf CVS, you must first get a copy of the
GPL, e.g., via the command (cd doc; wget
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.texi).
2004-12-20 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
* doc/gpl.texi: New file, taken from FSF but with different
section heading to fit into our manual.
* doc/Makefile.am (autoconf_TEXINFOS): Add gpl.texi.
* doc/autoconf.texi (@copying): Allow programs in this
manual to be copied under the GPL.
(GNU General Public License): New node.
(Copying This Manual): Add a brief intro.
--- doc/gpl.texi-FSF 2001-07-15 04:55:07 -0700
+++ doc/gpl.texi 2004-12-19 06:57:49 -0800
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
address@hidden Copying
address@hidden GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
address@hidden GNU General Public License
address@hidden GNU General Public License
@center Version 2, June 1991
@c This file is intended to be included in another file.
Index: doc/Makefile.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -p -u -r1.29 Makefile.am
--- doc/Makefile.am 23 May 2003 13:09:30 -0000 1.29
+++ doc/Makefile.am 20 Dec 2004 08:55:08 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
## Process this file with automake to create Makefile.in.
## Makefile for Autoconf.
-## Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+## Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ TEXI2HTML = texi2html
TEXI2HTML_FLAGS = -split_chapter
info_TEXINFOS = autoconf.texi standards.texi
-autoconf_TEXINFOS = fdl.texi install.texi
+autoconf_TEXINFOS = fdl.texi gpl.texi install.texi
standards_TEXINFOS = make-stds.texi
# Files from texi2dvi that should be removed, but which Automake does
Index: doc/autoconf.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/autoconf.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.854
diff -p -u -r1.854 autoconf.texi
--- doc/autoconf.texi 18 Dec 2004 00:44:34 -0000 1.854
+++ doc/autoconf.texi 20 Dec 2004 08:55:10 -0000
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and wi
modify this @acronym{GNU} Manual, like @acronym{GNU} software. Copies
published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for
@acronym{GNU} development.''
+
+Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify the program code
+in this document under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your
+option) any later version. A copy of this license is included in the
+section entitled address@hidden General Public License''.
@end quotation
@end copying
@@ -560,6 +566,7 @@ History of Autoconf
Copying This Manual
* GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual
+* GNU General Public License:: License for copying program code in this manual
Indices
@@ -16293,11 +16300,17 @@ have free time again. I think. Yeah, r
@appendix Copying This Manual
@cindex License
+As the copyright notice explains, this manual can be copied under the
+terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, and the program code in this
+manual can be copied under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
+
@menu
* GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual
+* GNU General Public License:: License for copying program code in this manual
@end menu
@include fdl.texi
address@hidden gpl.texi
@node Indices
@appendix Indices
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, (continued)
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/21
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bruce Korb, 2004/12/21
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/20
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/19
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2004/12/18
Re: OK to distribute autoconf.texi under the GPL too?, Bob Proulx, 2004/12/18