[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4 |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:59:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:54:37PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > How about this slightly simpler patch instead? If you don't like it,
> > then I think your patch is a definite improvement, and is OK by me.
>
> I prefer yours and almost went that way myself, but wonder if it's
> portable enough. I don't see any other uses of 'if...fi <', in autoconf.
Yes, that's pretty portable. IIRC it may create a subshell, but that
doesn't matter here.
> > then it would make a difference. The original aim was that users should
> > be able to substitute any characters they like (except for \0). And the
> > above is not so unlikely if the configure script itself happens to be
> > converted to w32 text mode.
>
> Good to know I wasn't preserving that code for nothing ;-)
> I'll add a comment to that effect.
Thanks!
Ralf
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, (continued)
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Working os/2 configuratie, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/05
- Re: Working os/2 configuratie, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/06
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05