[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4 |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:39:15 +0200 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 4/5/2008 7:26 AM:
> |
> | For reference, here is a sequence of two patches, mine, then, on top
> | of that, Ralf's:
>
> I merged the two, and and have this queued to be committed (although it
> would be nice to hear a success story from Elbert):
[Elbert, would you please "reply-all" next time, so the
others Cc'd and the mailing list get a copy. Thanks. ]
Elbert replied privately:
Hi Jim,
Think you made it working for os/2
Configure just worked fine, gonna try later the make, but wanne thankz
you verry much to help me out with this probleme for os/2 :P
I send logs also...
config.log.bz2
Description: Binary data
out.bz2
Description: Binary data
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, (continued)
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/06
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
Re: Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, ziedar, 2008/04/06