[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 08:50:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:46:43PM CET:
> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/22/2008 10:43 AM:
> >> -[m4_ifset([AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD],
> >> +[m4_ifval(AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD,
> >
> > If these kinds of changes are required in Autoconf code, it looks like
> > user code might be affected, too. Have you checked for third-party
> > instances of this? Also, is this an incompatibility to earlier
> > semantics?
>
> The semantics should be identical for third-party use;
assuming that no third-party code uses m4_ifdef([AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD]).
Right?
FWIW, I haven't found using this, but it is a semantic change this way.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Eric Blake, 2008/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Eric Blake, 2008/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Eric Blake, 2008/11/12
- AS_MESSAGE_FD [was: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided], Eric Blake, 2008/11/12
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Eric Blake, 2008/11/21
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Eric Blake, 2008/11/22
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/22
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Eric Blake, 2008/11/22
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Eric Blake, 2008/11/23
- Re: AS_MESSAGE_FD, Eric Blake, 2008/11/24
Re: [PATCH] Pass CONFIG_SHELL down if provided, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/12