[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: amtraces
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: amtraces |
Date: |
02 Feb 2001 19:01:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
"Derek R. Price" <address@hidden> writes:
> Ok, I have amtraces code that slurps in almost all the information that
> scan_one_autoconf_file used to. Unfortuantely I hit a minor snag:
We are probably working on the same things. Please, show some code so
that we don't duplicate.
> Since _all_ AC_SUBSTs are being processed now, at least one instance
> where Automake was allowing for user override is now broken.
>
> The case in question is the DEFAULT_INCLUDES variable being substituted
> in as part of DEFS.
I don't understand :(
> Since Automake still asumes that a call to AC_SUBST(DEFS) is always
> user-requested and that a user request overrides the version of DEFS
> from comp-vars.am, DEFAULT_INCLUDES is no longer being set.
>
> Since counting the AC_SUBST calls would be painful (each macro would
> have a different user count threshold and this could be variable), I'm
> thinking that the best solution is to define an AM_DEFS variable
> (modeled after AM_CPPFLAGS & AM_CFLAGS) and make it part of the COMPILE
> variable, then subst the old DEFAULT_INCLUDES value into that.
>
> Is this the correct approach?
I really don't understand what you are talking about... What is
DEFAULT_INCLUDES, how does it work?
- amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, akim, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, assignments, 2001/02/06
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/03