[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: amtraces
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: amtraces |
Date: |
02 Feb 2001 17:16:46 -0700 |
>>>>> "Akim" == akim <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> As far as I'm concerned, given that your mark are extremely easy
Akim> to remove, given that most messages are from the experimental
Akim> code, given that I certainly would like to toy with your
Akim> implementation, I'd vote for an inclusion in Automake. Do you
Akim> have your papers? :)
Akim, provided that the changes don't break using automake with an
older autoconf, I trust your judgement on reviewing them. I still
haven't looked at the --trace code. Ideally we'd have things in shape
so that removing the non-trace code for the release after the next one
will be easy.
Tom
- amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, akim, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, assignments, 2001/02/06
- Re: amtraces,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/08
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04
- Re: 31-ac-libsources.patch & Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04