[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DIST_COMMON broke
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: DIST_COMMON broke |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:03:25 -0500 (EST) |
> This area still requires more work. I think I know another case where
> it can fail: suppose you do `AC_OUTPUT(subdir/foo)' where there is no
> Makefile.am in subdir? Then I think no rule to rebuild subdir/foo
> will be generated.
I would not call it a "failure" - if Automake doesn't control that
directory then it shouldn't care.
I don't like rules that rebuild something in a directory other than "."
and (in limited situations) $srcdir.
Maybe my understanding is too primitive, I don't know.
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: DIST_COMMON broke, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07