[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_CFLAGS
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: AM_CFLAGS |
Date: |
12 Feb 2001 00:42:18 -0700 |
>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:
>> In the recent namespace conversation we didn't mention macros like
>> `AM_CFLAGS'. This is an automake-specific macro which the user is
>> allowed to set.
>> How should we rename these?
Alexandre> Why should we rename these? Their names look fine to me.
My understanding is that autoconf prevents us from putting these names
(AM_*) into configure.in. However, this is a perfectly reasonable
thing to do from automake's perspective. In fact, it is probably a
preferred approach for packages with special flags requirements and
multiple directories.
Tom
- AM_CFLAGS, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/11
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/11
- Re: AM_CFLAGS,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/13
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/13
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/13
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Steve Robbins, 2001/02/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/13