[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Manual additions (DOS issues)
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
RE: Manual additions (DOS issues) |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:47:37 +0100 |
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
Akim Demaille
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:43
To: Tim Van Holder
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: Manual additions (DOS issues)
"Tim Van Holder" <address@hidden> writes:
> OK - here goes. I've listed '[\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*' as the canonical
> absolute path test; I'll submit patches to use this throughout autoconf
> later.
Plenty of thanks!
> address@hidden @bullet
@bullets are atrocious! We use @minus.
> address@hidden No multiple address@hidden
I removed the @*, AFAIK it's useless here, and anyway it is
inconsistent with the rest of the doc.
> +DOS cannot handle multiple dots in filenames. This is an especially
important
> We promote @sc{dos}.
Thanks a _lot_ for your submission!
- Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support, Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/10
- Re: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/19
- RE: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support, Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/19
- Re: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/20
- Manual additions (DOS issues), Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/20
- Re: Manual additions (DOS issues), Akim Demaille, 2001/02/21
- RE: Manual additions (DOS issues),
Tim Van Holder <=
- RE: Manual additions (DOS issues), Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/21
- Re: Manual additions (DOS issues), Akim Demaille, 2001/02/22
- Re: Manual additions (DOS issues), Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/22
- RE: Manual additions (DOS issues), Tim Van Holder, 2001/02/22