[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 82-lang-finish.patch
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: 82-lang-finish.patch |
Date: |
10 Apr 2001 21:45:09 -0600 |
>>>>> "Akim" == akim <address@hidden> writes:
>> I have a mild dislike for this.
>> If `finish' were a method then we could simply inherit it.
Akim> I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that
Akim> we are defining methods per _object_. Cleaner would mean one
Akim> *class* per language, which seems overkill to me.
Really? Why? To me it seems natural.
Tom
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/04/10
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, akim, 2001/04/10
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/04/11
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, akim, 2001/04/11
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, akim, 2001/04/11
- Re: 82-lang-finish.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/04/12