[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc and atmega324
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc and atmega324 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:47:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
As Uwe Fechner wrote:
> > Thanks for the hint. May I use avr-libc-cvs with older binutils
> >and gcc (2.15 and 3.4.3 Debian packages patched for atmega324) or
> >it is necessary to use binutils 2.16 and gcc-3.4.4?
GCC 3.4.3 vs. 3.4.4 probably makes not much of a difference.
binutils 2.16 has support for some of the recent AVRs added by
default (CAN128, tiny13/2313, megaX8).
> Does anybody else on this list knows the differences between
> gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-3.4.3
ISTR at least one major ``pessimisation'' issue has been fixed that
affects the AVR target.
> or between binutils 2.15 and 2.16 regarding the avr port?
See above.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)