[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?

[Andy Warner]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Dmitry Xmelkov provided speed-improved versions of itoa() & Co. that
> no longer use standard division functions for formatting:
> [...]
> I tend to see this as benign, as I cannot imagine why anyone would
> want to print out numbers base 7 or base 13, so I'm inclined to
> replace the existing itoa() family by Dmitry's submission.  When doing

Please do. Smaller, faster code for the cases that we care about,
a viable solution for the corner cases that I've never needed.
Sounds ideal.

<slightly off topic>
I lost track of some earlier changes to the stdio library
that freed it from pulling in malloc() and friends, can
anyone jog my memory on how that played out ?
</slightly off topic>
-- 
address@hidden

Andy Warner             Voice: (612) 801-8549   Fax: (208) 575-5634