[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with ba
From: |
Daniel O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:51:14 +1030 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:04, Russell Shaw wrote:
> > It will if it's implemented correctly, eg in stdlib.h
> >
> > #ifdef _USE_FULL_ITOA
> > #define itoa _itoa_full
> > #else
> > #define itoa _itoa_small
> > #endif
>
> Even if functions are unused in a library that is linked, don't they still
> end up in the final binary?
No, they don't, otherwise you'd run out of flash space all the time :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
pgp1s0UZth1Mx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [avr-libc-dev] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/11/18
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Andy Warner, 2005/11/19
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2005/11/19
- Message not available
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Russell Shaw, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Daniel O'Connor, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Russell Shaw, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?,
Daniel O'Connor <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Russell Shaw, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Rolf Ebert, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & cowith base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Jörgen Birkler, 2005/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & cowith base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/11/19
- [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Anton Erasmus, 2005/11/19
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Rolf Ebert, 2005/11/19
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?, Bernard Fouché, 2005/11/22
- Prev by Date:
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
- Next by Date:
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
- Previous by thread:
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
- Next by thread:
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
- Index(es):