[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?

[Rolf Ebert]

> The only drawback of that approach is that its use will restrict the
> posible base of these functions to either 2, 8, 10, or 16.
>
> Opinions?

I am in favor of a fast and restricted itoa as the default. Even more so  
if you still provide the full implementation by a simple compile time  
switch.

    Rolf