|
From: | Dmitry K. |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}? |
Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:35:09 +1000 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.5 |
> > I vote for something like itoa_fast() and have itoa() keeps its old > > features. > > > > Bernard > > If anyone is counting votes then mine is to support Bernard, keep itoa as > is but introduce a restricted replacement with a new name. > > > Nigel Winterbottom I join this opinion. Dmitry.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |