Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?

[Bjarne Laursen]

>I vote for something like itoa_fast() and have itoa() keeps its old
> features.

Agree, why not also get the radix out of the parameter list and into the 
function name like:

char * itoa_2(int /value/, char */string/);

char * itoa_16(int /value/, char */string/);

-Bjarne*
*