Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?

[Derric Tubbs]

I third this opinion.

Tubbs - KF4DBD

--- "Dmitry K." <address@hidden> wrote:

> > > I vote for something like itoa_fast() and have
> itoa() keeps its old
> > > features.
> > >
> > >   Bernard
> >
> > If anyone is counting votes then mine is to
> support Bernard, keep itoa as
> > is but introduce a restricted replacement with a
> new name.
> >
> >
> > Nigel Winterbottom
> 
> I join this opinion.
> 
> Dmitry.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> address@hidden
>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>