[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude
From: |
idefixx |
Subject: |
[avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:46:04 +1100 |
Hi guys!
Was pretty busy during last few weeks. Now I continue my studies on programming
speed.
I did some oscilloscope measurments on the SCK signal (using pony programmer
dongle) and found out the following:
* while programming the first 40% of the AVR flash (~3200 bytes) the
programming mainly runs in a loop like that:
1) Performing the "Write Program Memory" command for 3 times (writes 3 bytes to
flash memory) by using data polling between the commands two times
2) Then the SCK signal is logical '0' for the time of "min_write_delay" as set
in avrdude.conf
3) continued with 1)
--> write --> poll --> write --> poll --> write --> wait min_write_delay -->
<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
* at about 40% of the flash is written the signal changes to a loop that mainly
runs like that:
1) Performing the "Write Program Memory" command for 3 times (writes 3 bytes to
flash memory) by using data polling two times
2) Then the SCK signal is logical '0' for the time of "min_write_delay" as set
in avrdude.conf
3) Performing the "Write Program Memory" command for 1 time
4) Then the SCK signal is logical '0' for the time of "max_write_delay" as set
in avrdude.conf
5) continued with 1)
--> write --> poll --> write --> poll --> write --> wait min_write_delay -->
write --> wait min_write_delay -->
<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
I also measured the SCK signal of the STK500 board and it seems to use data
polling exclusively and therefore the programming here is much faster.
Why does AVRdude perform so many min_ and max_write_delay's? And why does the
behaviour change at 40% ?
/idefixx
- [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude,
idefixx <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, idefixx, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18