[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude
From: |
Jan-Hinnerk Reichert |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:35:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
On Monday 17 November 2003 01:46, idefixx wrote:
> Hi guys!
> Was pretty busy during last few weeks. Now I continue my studies on
> programming speed.
>
> I did some oscilloscope measurments on the SCK signal (using pony
> programmer dongle) and found out the following:
Call avrdude with "-v -v", then you have output of all SPI activity.
It seems like polling is not implemented very well. If I understood
the code in "avr.c":
- Polling is not done if the data is either "readback_p1" or
"readback_p2" (can anyone explain to me why readback_p2=0x00 ?)
- Even if polling is used there is a sleep of min_write_delay
/Jan-Hinnerk
- [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, idefixx, 2003/11/16
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, idefixx, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/17
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/18