[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch)
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch) |
Date: |
Wed, 05 May 2004 12:42:31 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> "Mark D. Baushke" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I am willing to run any tests you may wish on your new patches to
> > exercise them for FreeBSD make.
>
> I guess my first question is: did those changes cause a regression,
> i.e. does a test fail with those changes but succeed without the
> changes? If so, we should fix them before installing them.
Okay, I have checked out a fresh top-level tree of automake and am
running it thru '/usr/bin/make check' right now. It will likely take
a bit of time before I have all of the results.
> More generally, a port of Automake to FreeBSD would be a good thing,
> but it sounds a bit awkward to have you run tests and have me fix
> things.
Yes, I can understand that.
> I have easy access to an OpenBSD host: perhaps I should take a look at
> porting to that first.
If it works on OpenBSD it is much more likely to work on FreeBSD and
NetBSD too than if does not.
btw: I have a set of the OpenBSD 3.5 disks, but I have not had time to
find a machine and load it with OpenBSD yet.
> However, to be honest, I'd prefer it if someone else would come up
> with the patches and the test time....
I understand.
Hmmm... I could be wrong, but it looks like the automake top-of-tree
uses the autoconf top-of-tree and I am unable to checkout autoconf as I
get a permissions error:
% cvs -d :pserver:address@hidden:/cvs/autoconf co autoconf
cvs server: Updating autoconf
cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/cvs/autoconf/autoconf'
(/cvs/autoconf/autoconf/#cvs.lock): Permission denied
cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvs/autoconf/autoconf'
cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up
%
so, it may be difficult to know with certainty that I have the same set
of changes as you might in any case.
However, using autoconf-2.59, with the './bootstrap' command for automake
I have started a '/usr/bin/make check' to see if I still get the same
fifteen failures as with your untested patch. I will let you know what I
observe.
Thanks,
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAmUOn3x41pRYZE/gRAnB2AJ4knmQsZ9hu5jq/b6xpiBrr+2m0kQCgou4W
sh0U7j44gK0HSbzou5M2nqo=
=R1x5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Paul Eggert, 2004/05/05
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/05
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Mark D. Baushke, 2004/05/05
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/06
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Mark D. Baushke, 2004/05/06
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/13
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Mark D. Baushke, 2004/05/13
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/14
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Mark D. Baushke, 2004/05/14
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/14
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Mark D. Baushke, 2004/05/14
- Re: "make check-TEST" lossage on FreeBSD make (+ untested patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/05/13