|
From: | Reuben Thomas |
Subject: | Re: Portability warnings: split into non-GNU and non-portable? |
Date: | Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:25:41 +0000 (GMT) |
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Why not, I guess. Except that automake isn't really able to distinguish between GNU extensions and a large class of typos or otherwise malformed makefiles. Bothered enough to write a patch? ;-)
To clarify what I meant, I meant splitting the non-portable constructs it currently detects into a) GNU extensions and b) other non-portable constructs. Does that sound sane? Shouldn't therefore be a large patch.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |